Barbara Larson on how to manage remote teams and stay productive from anywhere
What is the future for remote work and how can we use it effectively? Whether you’re a manager, business leader o →
Some of the biggest blunders in history – both corporate and otherwise – can be attributed to the concept of groupthink. Along with new research on the topic come practical new tips for keeping it out of your decision making processes.
Have you ever run across a corporate decision that seemed so mind-boggling that you shook your head and wondered, “What were they thinking?”
In many cases, those head-scratcher decisions were brought on by the concept of groupthink. That’s what happens when otherwise intelligent individuals feel pressured to conform to the views expressed by influencers. Members hesitate to voice concerns for fear of being ridiculed, and, in the absence of dissent, assume all others approve of the decisions being made.
Perhaps the most colossal marketing failure ever, Coca-Cola’s launch of New Coke in the mid-1980s, was in large part due to groupthink. More recently, the global banking crisis of 2008 was triggered by an epic pattern of groupthink.
But groupthink isn’t just limited to large-scale corporate decisions. Smaller ones – such as buying software, introducing a new product or even hiring a new employee – can fall victim to it as well.
And that worries me. In a flat global organization, productive collaboration and collective decision making are key. When you consider how many collaborative decisions a company makes every day, the potential for some, or many, to become infected with groupthink is staggering. This could distort the depicted benefits of the collaborative movement!
New Research—and Reasons to be Wary
Although the concept of groupthink has been around for decades, some new – and perhaps worrisome – thinking has emerged in a book, “Wiser: Getting Beyond Groupthink to Make Groups Smarter,” by Cass Sunstein, a professor at Harvard University.
The book argues that a group’s deliberation process actually tends to amplify, instead of correct, mistakes. Worse, while debating an issue, the group will eventually stake out an even more extreme position than it adopted initially by focusing on information that supports its point of view and ignoring contradictory information.
The result, as we all know, is a lousy decision.
So how do we avoid the scourge of groupthink in our collaborative decisions? Fortunately, the book provides a few insights, which I plan to use during my next decision making session.
Let’s face it: Decisions made on group level are never easy. And they’re even less so when it has been overtaken by groupthink. Knowing what groupthink is and how to avoid it can help us meet the potential of the collective and increase the productivity of collaboration.