Loading component...

How to Run Inclusive Meetings Using Psychological Safety

Ever been in a meeting where you had something valuable to share—but decided not to? Maybe you worried it wasn’t the right time, or you felt unsure how your input would be received.


It’s easy to chalk moments like these up to nerves or uncertainty, but there’s often something bigger at play: a lack of psychological safety—the sense that it’s truly safe to speak up without fear of judgment or negative consequences.


Meetings often fail not because of a lack of talent or ideas but because the environment isn’t one where every voice feels safe to speak. This article explores what an inclusive meeting is, what makes meetings non-inclusive, and how to conduct a meeting where everyone feels safe enough to contribute.

What is an inclusive meeting?

An inclusive meeting is one where every participant—regardless of rank, communication style, geographic location, or ability—has an opportunity to contribute and feels safe doing so.


But truly fostering inclusivity takes more than good intentions. It requires thoughtful decisions about the agenda, tools, tone, and language to create a space where no single voice or group unintentionally dominates.


Here’s what an inclusive meeting looks like in practice:

  • The organizer sends a clear agenda and pre-reads ahead of time so that quieter or more reflective team members can prepare their insights.
  • During the meeting, they encourage questions and feedback. They explicitly invite input from each employee—especially if it’s a hybrid meeting where some participants are there in person and others are remote.
  • They use high-resolution cameras and noise-canceling headsets to ensure every participant is visible and audible.
  • And wrap up by inviting each participant to share their thoughts, ensuring everyone has a chance to speak before the meeting concludes.

On the flip side, here’s what a non-inclusive meeting might look like:

  • The invite arrives last minute with little to no context, making it hard for participants to prepare.
  • A few dominant voices take over the discussion, while others struggle to find space to contribute.
  • Remote attendees face challenges like distorted or intermittent audio, making it difficult to fully engage.
  • Questions are unknowingly brushed aside or left unanswered, causing participants to feel dismissed.
  • The meeting ends abruptly, leaving some participants feeling overlooked or unsure of the next steps.

Loading component...

What causes meetings to not be inclusive?

Quite a few seemingly minor oversights, including:

  • Unclear or nonexistent agendas: Without a clear agenda, meetings give room to assertive participants who may unintentionally dominate the conversation, steering it toward their interests, while quieter members struggle to insert their thoughts.
  • One-size-fits-all communication: Meetings that rely solely on a single communication style overlook the varied needs of participants. For example, using only spoken language can exclude introverted individuals, people with hearing impairments, or those who are neurodivergent — all of whom may benefit from features like live captioning, sign language, visual aids, or written input.
  • Rigid hierarchies: When meetings are controlled primarily by senior or more confident voices, less experienced or lower-rank team members may hesitate to speak up.
  • Neglecting hybrid/remote participants: Remote colleagues can miss nonverbal cues and side conversations if the meeting setup focuses only on those in the room. Glitchy audio, low volume, or grainy video amplify this divide, making it difficult for remote participants to engage fully.
  • Unconscious bias in conversations: Organizers may unknowingly favor certain participants—for example, by giving more speaking time to those who share similar communication styles or backgrounds—while overlooking others. This unintentional favoritism erodes trust and discourages diverse perspectives over time.
  • Meeting fatigue: Frequent, overly long, or poorly structured meetings can drain energy and focus, causing participants to tune out. This disengagement weakens collaboration and leads to fewer voices actively contributing.
  • Limited training or resources: Teams without sufficient diversity and inclusion training or tools can default to routine practices that exclude some meeting participants.

Loading component...

8 ways to make meetings inclusive with psychological safety

From breaking meetings up to using check-ins, here are eight practical tips to help you create a meeting environment where every voice is genuinely heard.

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...

Loading component...